COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF EFFICIENCY OF DIESEL HAMMER AND DROP HAMMER PIECES ON PILE FOUNDATION WORK IN WETLAND

  • Candra Yuliana Candra Civil Engineering
  • Retna Hapsari K Program Studi Teknik Sipil Fakultas Teknik Universitas Lambung Mangkurat
  • Eva Puspita Sari Program Studi Teknik Sipil Fakultas Teknik Universitas Lambung Mangkurat
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35814/infrastruktur.v7i2.1267
Abstract views: 665 | pdf downloads: 2580
Keywords: Diesel Hammer, Drop Hammer, Efficient, Productivity

Abstract

The pile driving method requires the management of heavy equipment such as pile drivers as the main equipment for the construction of pile foundations. Pile driver productivity is very influential in terms of time and cost during implementation. Therefore, it is necessary to study the productivity of the pile driver by comparing the Diesel Hammer and Drop Hammer in a project. The driving work with Diesel Hammer tools produces a productivity of 17.98 m/hour, the total duration of driving is 21 points for 49 hours with equipment rental of Rp. 15.240.000,-. Meanwhile, with the Drop Hammer the productivity is 11.71 m/hour, the duration is 77 hours, the total equipment rental is Rp. 14,940,000,-. In terms of time and cost efficiency with a certain depth, there are significant time and cost differences between the two tools. Both pile drivers have advantages and disadvantages, but in terms of time and cost efficiency. Based on the time aspect, the Diesel Hammer is more efficient than the Drop Hammer, but it is necessary to consider the cost aspect.

References

Bowles, J.E. (1991). Analisa dan desain Pondasi : Edisi 3 Jilid 2. Erlangga, Jakarta.

Dwiretnani, Annisaa, Indra Agustian Daulay. (2019). Kinerja Alat Hydraulic Static Pile Driver (HSPD) pada Proyek Perluasan Terminal Bandara Sultan Thaha Jambi. Jurnal Talenta Sipil, v.2(2), Agustus 2019, pp. 67-81.

Erizal. (2018). Alat Berat Kontruksi Tiang Pancang, Institut Pertanian Bogor. Bahan Ajar. Bogor

Fitrianti Nur Lathifah D., Anik Ratnaningsi, Jojok W. Soetjibto. (2014). Perbandingan Efisiensi Alat Diesel Hammer dan Hydraulic Hammer Pada Pekerjaan Pondasi Tiang Pancang Dari Segi Waktu dan Biaya. Teknik Sipil. Fakultas Teknik. Universitas Jember.

Hidajat, I. (2017). Optimasi Penggunaan Alat Berat Dilihat Dari Waktu Dan Biaya. Jurnal Spectra, v. 7 (13): 1–14.

Kaprina, A., Winarto. (2017). Analisa Produktivitas Alat Berat Pada Proyek Pembangunan Gedung Fakultas Syariah dan Ilmu Hukum IAIN Tulungagung. Universitas Kediri. Kediri.

Mulyono, T. (2015). Pelaksanaan Pemancangan dan Analisa Dinamis, Teknik Pondasi IIJTS.FT.UNJ, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jakarta.

Nisa, K. (2016). Analisa Produktivitas Tenaga Kerja Pada Pekerjaan Pondasi (Studi Kasus Proyek Pembangunan Hotel Muraya Banda Aceh. Etd Unsyiah.

Permen PUPR No. 28. (2016). Pedoman Analisis Harga Satuan Pekerjaan Bidang Pekerjaan Umum, Kementrian PUPR, Jakarta.

Pratama, Muhammad Indra, Adwitya Bhaskara. (2020). Perbandingan Biaya dan Waktu untuk Pekerjaan Tiang Pancang Metode Hydraulic Static Pile Driver dan Drop Hammer. Jurnal Reviews in Civil Engineering, v.04, n.2, p.62-68.

Puspita, D. A. (2016). Analisa Produktivitas Alat Berat Diesel Hammer Dan Hydraulic Hammer Pada Pemasangan Pondasi Tiang Pancang Di Proyek Pembangunan Gedung 2 SMK 1 MUHAMMADIYAH Kepanjen Kab. Malang. Skripsi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang). Malang.

Rostiyanti, S.F. 2008. Alat Berat Untuk Proyek Konstruksi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Saputra, E., & Halim, T. 2011. Produktivitas Alat Pancang Terhadap Analisa Waktu Pada Pekerjaan Banjir Kanal Timur. Jurnal Konstruksia, Vol. 2 No. 2. Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta.

Sardjono, H.S. (1991). Pondasi Tiang Pancang, edisi 2. Sinar Wijaya. Surabaya.

Sudarsono, S., Kazuto N. 1980. Mekanika Tanah dan Teknik Pondasi, Association for International Technical Promotion. Tokyo,Japan.

Published
2021-10-28
How to Cite
Candra, C. Y., K, R. H., & Sari, E. P. (2021). COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF EFFICIENCY OF DIESEL HAMMER AND DROP HAMMER PIECES ON PILE FOUNDATION WORK IN WETLAND. Jurnal Infrastruktur , 7(2), 87 - 92. https://doi.org/10.35814/infrastruktur.v7i2.1267