MAPPING THE LITERATURE ON COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION IN URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS
Abstract views: 36 | pdf downloads: 21
Abstract
This research was conducted to explore community participation in urban infrastructure development using bibliometric analysis of the Scopus database. This study aims to identify trends, gaps, and contributions of researchers in this field. Results show that the number of studies related to community participation in urban infrastructure development has increased significantly, peaking in 2021. Sustainability Switzerland is the publisher with the most contributions, while The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, University Bosowa, and the University of Cape Town are the most active affiliates.The most dominant field of study in this study is Social Sciences, with a total of 155 articles. Keyword cluster analysis divides this study into three main focuses: climate change mitigation, governance-based participation, and water and sanitation management. Potential areas for further research include equity, technology in participation, and assessing the impact of community participation in infrastructure development.
References
Azad, A. K., & Parvin, S. (2022). Bibliometric analysis of photovoltaic thermal (PV/T) system: From citation mapping to research agenda. Energy Reports, 8, 2699–2711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.182
Baas, J., Schotten, M., Plume, A., Côté, G., & Karimi, R. (2020). Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00019
Birkle, C., Pendlebury, D. A., Schnell, J., & Adams, J. (2020). Web of Science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00018
Publikasi Karya Ilmiah, 152/E/T/2012 (2012) (testimony of Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi).
Grigg, N. S. (1988). Infrastructure Engineering and Management. John Wiley & Sons.
Gusenbauer, M. (2019). Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases. Scientometrics, 118(1), 177–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2958-5
Gusenbauer, M., & Haddaway, N. R. (2020). Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Research Synthesis Methods, 11(2), 181–217. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1378
Karim, A. (2022). Analisis Bibliometrik Menggunakan Vosviewer Terhadap Trend Riset Matematika Terapan Di Google Scholar. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika Jakarta, 3(2), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.21009/jrpmj.v3i2.22264
Liu, S., & Chen, C. (2011). The effects of co-citation proximity on co-citation analysis. Proceedings of ISSI 2011 - 13th Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, 1, 474–484.
Martín-Martín, A., Thelwall, M., Orduna-Malea, E., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2021). Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations. In Scientometrics (Vol. 126, Issue 1). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03690-4
Rorong, F., Rares, J. J., & Ruru, J. M. (2017). Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Pembangunan Infrastruktur Di Desa Tolombukan Satu Kecamatan Pasan Kabupaten Minahasa Tenggara. Jurnal Administrasi Publik UNSRAT, 3(46).
Van Noorden, R. (2014). Google Scholar pioneer on search engine’s future. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2014.16269
Zhang, Y., Wang, W., Mi, L., Huang, C., Xiao, H., Shang, K., Qiao, L., & Wang, L. (2022). Organizational resilience in development: A systematic review based on bibliometric analysis and visualization. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 83(August), 103408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103408
Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Infrastruktur
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
