Universitas Milik Perusahaan sebagai Strategi Talent Pooling: Peluang atau Tantangan?
Abstract views: 258 | PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloads: 118
Abstract
Some companies in Indonesia established university as their business units. Apart from educating the young generation, these company-owned universities were also meant to attract talent into the company. Hence, senior employees were often tasked to share the classified practices of the company. However, this strategy could backfire if graduates joined the competitors instead. This research set out to uncover whether company owned university is a good strategy for attracting prospective talents. The construct used in this study is organizational attraction; the positive attitude of an individual to an organization. Quantitative method were used to collect the data. 474 students (178 males, 296 females) participated in this research and were divided into two groups; those who study in company owned university and those who do not. Independent-sample t-test was used to compare the organization attraction of the two groups. Result showed significant difference between company owned university students (M= 54.07. SD= 7.937) and private university (M= 51.69. SD= 7.716); t(472)= 3.309; p= 0.001. This result indicates that the students who study at company owned university were more attracted to work at holding company rather than student who studying at private university.
References
Ahamad, F. (2019). Impact of word-of-mouth, job attributes and relationship strength on employer attractiveness. Management Research Review, 42(6), 721–739. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-11-2017-0382
Alnıaçık, E., & Alnıaçık, Ü. (2012). Identifying dimensions of attractiveness in employer branding: effects of age, gender, and current employment status. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58, 1336-1343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1117
Aslan, G., Alinçe, M., Araza, A., & Dural, S. (2019). Organizational Attractiveness: an Empirical Study on Students’ Public or Private Sector Choice. (14).
Banirestu, H. (2018). BUMN University Bersiap Hadapi Revolusi Industri 4.0.
Baporikar, N. (2015). Role of corporate universities in higher education. International Journal of Applied Management Sciences and Engineering, 2(1), 30-43. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijamse.2015010103
Benraiss-Noailles, L., Herrbach, O., & Viot, C. (2019). The impact of employer brand equality on organizational attractiveness: The moderating role of familiarity. Management & Avenir, 107, 37-59.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. In Educational Research (Vol. 4). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Etikan, I. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
Gerald, B. (2018). A brief review of independent, dependent and one sample t-test. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, 4(2), 50. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijamtp.20180402.13
Gomes, D., & Neves, J. (2011). Organizational attractiveness and prospective applicants’ intentions to apply. Personnel Review, 40(6), 684-699. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483481111169634
Hendriks, M., Bondarouk, T., & Bos-Nehles, A. C. (2016). Organizational reputation, organizational attractiveness and employer branding: clarifying the concepts. (October), 115.
Highhouse, S., Lievens, F., & Sinar, E. F. (2003). Measuring attraction to organizations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63(6), 986-1001. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164403258403
Jatmiko, P. B. (2004). The influence of firm ecological recruitment advertisements on organizational attractiveness and career choices: An experimental research. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 6(2), 155-169. https://doi.org/10.22146/gamaijb.5549
Kashive, N., & Khanna, V. T. (2017). Study of early recruitment activities and employer brand knowledge and its effect on organization attractiveness and firm performance. Global Business Review, 18(3), S172-S190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150917693334
Maria, A., & Kumar, P. (2016). The 7 Fundamentals of Highly Performed Corporate University. Jakarta: PT Intipesan Pariwara.
Nathan, A. J., & Scobell, A. (2012). How China sees America. In Foreign Affairs (Vol. 91). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Nelloh, L. (2018). Intentions to apply as internship students on digital start-up companies in Jakarta. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 20(2), 347-366. https://doi.org/10.24914/jeb.v20i2.1000
Nixon, J. C., & Helms, M. M. (2002). Corporate universities vs higher education institutions. Industrial and Commercial Training, 34(4), 144-150. https://doi.org/10.1108/00197850210429129
Rocky, & Dahesihsari, R. (2016). The organizational attraction at company-owned univesity. International Research Journal of Business Studies, 9(3), 185-195. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21632/irjbs.9.3.185-197
Russell, S., & Brannan, M. J. (2016). “Getting the Right People on the Bus”: Recruitment, selection and integration for the branded organization. European Management Journal, 34(2), 114-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2016.01.001
Stahl, G. K., Björkman, I., Farndale, E., Morris, S. S., Paauwe, J., Stiles, P., … Wright, P. (2012). Six principles of effective global talent management. MIT Sloan Management Review, 53(2), 25-32. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/914408228?accountid=48149
Rothwell, W. J., & Benscoter, G. M. (2012). The Encyclopedia of Human Resource Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118364710
Wei, Y. C., Chang, C. C., Lin, L. Y., & Liang, S. C. (2016). A fit perspective approach in linking corporate image and intention-to-apply. Journal of Business Research, 69(6), 2220–2225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.033
