Analisis Properti Psikometri: Liverpool Stoicism Scale Berbahasa Indonesia pada Mahasiswa Generasi Z

Apriliya Wahyu Putri Wahyu; Priskila Andia Kristianti; Adinda Ajeng Puspa; Syafiga Nafis Mufarrohah Subagyo; Hajarotul Annisa Windraguri; Ninik Setiyowati

doi:10.35814/mindset.v15i02.4990

Apriliya Wahyu Putri Wahyu Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Negeri Malang, Kota Malang, Jawa Timur, Indonesia
Priskila Andia Kristianti Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Negeri Malang, Kota Malang, Jawa Timur, Indonesia
Adinda Ajeng Puspa Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Negeri Malang, Kota Malang, Jawa Timur, Indonesia
Syafiga Nafis Mufarrohah Subagyo Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Negeri Malang, Kota Malang, Jawa Timur, Indonesia
Hajarotul Annisa Windraguri Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Negeri Malang, Kota Malang, Jawa Timur, Indonesia
Ninik Setiyowati Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Negeri Malang, Kota Malang, Jawa Timur, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35814/mindset.v15i02.4990
Abstract views: 80 | PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloads: 93

Keywords: factor analysis, liverpool stoicism scale, psychometric property analysis, stoicism

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the suitability of the 20-item Liverpool Stoicism Scale (LSS) translated into Indonesian for measuring the unobservable construct of Stoicism among Generation Z undergraduate students (n=325). The questionnaire was distributed online, using Beaton, et al. (2000) cross-cultural adaptation method. Factor analysis was performed using both Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). The CFA results indicated factor loadings ranging from 0.120 to 0.477, with a reliability coefficient (α = 0.751) deemed acceptable. However, the EFA results identified only 5 items that loaded onto 2 factors, accounting for 59.199% of the variance, with a low reliability coefficient (α = 0.454). In conclusion, the Indonesian version of the LSS demonstrates weak validity and reliability, thus it does not meet the standards required to measure stoic behavior in Generation Z undergraduate students.

References

Aeni, S. N. (2022, Maret 8). Memahami Karakteristik dan Ciri-Ciri Generasi Z. Katadata. https://katadata.co.id/sitinuraeni/berita/6226d6df12cfc/memahami-karakteristik-dan-ciri-ciri-generasi-z.

Arezah, E., & Safitri, R. E. (2022). Psikoedukasi Filosofi Stoic Pada Generasi Z. Jurnal Abdimas Indonesia, 2(4), 550-554. http://dx.doi.org/10.53769/jai.v2i4.348.

Azwar, S. (2012). Reliabilitas dan Validitas (Edisi 4). Pustaka Pelajar.

Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for The Process of Cross-cultural Adaptation of Self-report Measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186-3191. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014.

Brown, M. E., MacLellan, A., Laughey, W., Omer, U., Himmi, G., LeBon, T., & Finn, G. M. (2022). Can Stoic Training Develop Medical Student Empathy and Resilience? A Mixed-methods Study. BMC Medical Education, 22(1), 340. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03391-x.

Calderón, C., Ferrando, P. J., Seva, U. L. dkk. (2017). Psychometric Properties of Liverpool Stoicism Scale (LSS) in a Cohort of Patients with Resected Cancer in Adjuvant Treatment. Anales de Psicología, 33(3),621-629. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.33.3.277061.

Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. A. (2000). Introduction to LISREL: A Guide for the Uninitiated. SAGE Publications, Inc.

Durand, M., Shogry, S., & Baltzly, D. (2023, January 20). Stoicism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2023 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2023/entries/stoicism/.

Fan, X., Thompson, B., & Wang, L. (1999). Effects of Sample Size, Estimation Methods, and Model Specification on Structural Equation Modeling Fit Indexes. Struct Equ Modeling, 6(1), 56-83.

Ferrando, P. J., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2014). El Análisis Factorial Exploratorio de Los Ítems: Algunas Consideraciones Adicionales. Anales de Psicología, 30(3), 1170-1175. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.199991.

Furnham, A., Petrides, K. V., Sisterson, G., & Baluch, B. (2003). Repressive Coping Style and Positive Self-presentation. British Journal of Health Psychology, 8, 223-249. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910703321649187.

Gaitniece-Putāne, A. (2005). Liverpool Stoicism Scale Adaptation. Baltic Journal of Psychology, 6(1), 57-64.

Gomez, D., Carmona-Bayonas A, Hernandez R, Higuera O, Rogado J, Pacheco-Barcia V, et al. (2022) Stoic attitude in patients with cancer from the NEOcoping study: Cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE, 17(7): e0269712.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269712.

Gunawan, A., & Bintari, D. R. (2021). Kesejahteraan Psikologis, Stres, dan Regulasi Emosi pada Mahasiswa Baru Selama Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengukuran Psikologi, 10(1), 51-64.

Hendryadi. (2014). Content Validity (Validitas Isi). Teorionline Personal Paper, 1, 1-5.

Holiday, R., & Hanselman, S. (2016). The Daily Stoic: 366 Meditations on Wisdom, Perseverance, and the Art of Living. An Imprint of Penguin Random House LLC.

Kelly, J. (2021). The Philosophy of Stoicism: Relevance in Today’s Healthcare System. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, 114(11), 839-840. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcaa242.

Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. Guilford Press.

Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.

MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power Analysis and Determination of Sample Size for Covariance Structure Modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130-49.

MacLellan, A., & Derakshan N. (2020). The Efects of Stoic Training and Adaptive Working Memory Training on Emotional Vulnerability in High Worriers. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 45, 730-744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-020-10183-4.

Marsh, H. W., & Hocevar, D. (1985). Application of Confirmatory Factor Analysis to the Study of Self-concept: First-and Higher Order Factor Models and Their Invariance Across Groups. Psychological Bulletin, 97(3), 562-582. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.97.3.562.

McAteer, G., & Gillanders, D. (2019). Investigating The Role of Psychological Flexibility, Masculine Self‐esteem, and Stoicism as Predictors of Psychological Distress and Quality of Life in Men Living with Prostate Cancer. European Journal of Cancer Care, 28(4), e13097. 10.1111/ecc.13097.

Murray, G., Allen, N. B., Rawlings, D., & Trinder, J. (2002). Seasonality and Personality: A Prospective Investigation of Five Factor Model Correlates of Mood Seasonality. European Journal of Personality, 16(6), 457-468. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.462.

Steiger, J. H. (2007). Understanding the Limitations of Global Fit Assessment in Structural Equation Modeling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 893-898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.017.

Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif,Kualitatif, dan R & D. ALFABETA, CV.

Syarifuddin, A., Fitri, H. U., & Mayasari, A. (2021). Konsep Stoisisme untuk Mengatasi Emosi Negatif Menurut Henry Manampiring. Bulletin of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 3(2), 99-104. https://doi.org/10.51214/bocp.v3i2.116.

Wagstaff, G. F., & Rowledge, A. M. (1995). Stoicism: Its Relation to Gender, Attitudes Toward Poverty, and Reactions to Emotive Material. The Journal of Social Psychology, 135(2), 181-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1995.9711421.

West, R. F., Meserve, R. J., & Stanovich, K. E. (2012). Cognitive Sophistication Does Not Attenuate the Bias Blind Spot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(3), 506-519. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028857.

TOOLS

INDEXING