Analisis Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire pada Mahasiswa Program Kartu Indonesia Pintar-Kuliah

  • Farida Aini Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Pancasila, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Rizky Qastrunada Fatria Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah, Kota Tanggerang Selatan, Banten, Jawa Barat
Abstract views: 201 | PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloads: 97
Keywords: KIP-college, Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire, self-regulation, validity


Self-regulation in learning is one of the supporting factors for every student to achieve optimal learning outcomes, involved for the college students who receive the Kartu Indonesia Pintar (KIP-Smart Indonesian Cardi)-Kuliah (College) Program. The Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) questionnaire is one of the questionnaires to measure self-regulation in learning which was developed by Pintrich and De Groot (1990). The questionnaire consists of 81 items. Researchers have adapted it. This research aims to determine the validity and reliability of the questionnaire, besides that, the research aims to analyze the MSLQ as one-dimensional or multidimensional. The analyzed MSLQ instrument used the Rasch Model. Respondents for this research are 1258 students who came from 14 universities spread across 4 cities/districts. The validity test showed that 68 items were valid and 13 items were invalid with a reliability value of 0.95. The results of the one-dimensional test found that the raw variance explained by measure value was 36.7%, close to the expected value of 35.8%, this value is the sufficient category to be said to have one-dimensional. This research concludes that the MSLQ questionnaire is suitable for measuring self-regulation in learning for college students.


Azwar, S. (2012). Validitas dan realibilitas. Pustaka Belajar.

Boone, W. J., Staver, J. R., & Yale, M. S. (2014). Rasch analysis in the humansSciences. Springer.

Hasanah, U., Maria, S., & Lutfianawati, D. (2016). Hubungan regulasi diri dalam belajar dengan prestasi belajar pada mahasiswa angkatan 2016 Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Malahayati. Jurnal Psikologi Universitas Muhammadiyah Lampung. ISSN 2655-6936.

Hilpert, J. C., Stempien, J., Van Der Hoeven Kraft, K. J., & Husman, J. (2013). Evidence for the latent factor structure of the MSLQ: A new conceptualization of an established questionnaire. SAGE Open, 3(4).

Kehm, B. M., Larsen, M. R., & Sommersel, H. B. (2019). Student dropoutfrom universities in Europe: A review of empirical literature. Hungarian Educational Research Journal, 9(2), 147–164. [accessed Jun 14 2023].

Kemdikbud. (2020). Apakah KIP-Kuliah itu? Kenapa bukan disebut beasiswa?

Nomura, O., Soma, Y., Kijima, H., & Matsuyama, Y. (2023). Adapting the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire to the Japanese problem-based learning context: A validation study. Children, 10, 154.

Ramírez, O. C., Larruzea-Urkixo, N., & Paola, B. G. (2022). Adaptation to the spanish university context and psychometric properties of the MSLQ: Contributions to the measurement and analysis of gender differences of self-regulated learning. Anales De Psicología, 38(2), 295-306. doi:

Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & Mckeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the otivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (Mslq). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 801–813.

Pintrich, P. L., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82 (1), 33-40

Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 385- 407.

Roth, A., Ogrin, S., & Schmitz, B. (2016). Assessing self-regulated learning in higher education: A systematic literature review of self-report instruments, Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability. 225–250.

Rowe, F. A., & Rafferty, J. A. (2013). Instructional design interventions for supporting self-regulated learning: Enhancing academic outcomes in postsecondary e-learning environments. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9 (4), 590-601.

Septiana, T. W. (2021, Februari 5). UN 2021 dihapuskan, ini aturan kelulusan anak sekolah.

Stoeger, H., Fleischmann, S., & Obergriesser, S. (2015). Self-regulated learning (SRL) and the gifted learner in primary school: The theoretical basis and empirical findings on a research program dedicated to ensuring that all students learn to regulate their own learning. Asia Pacific Education Review 16(2). DOI:10.1007/s12564-015-9376-7.

Suminto, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Aplikasi pemodelan Rasch pada assessment pendidikan. Trim Komunikata.

Wolters, C. A., Pintrich, P. R., & Karabenick, S.A. (2005). Assessing academic self-regulated learning. Springer.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement. Routledge.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1): 166–183.

How to Cite
Aini, F., & Fatria, R. Q. (2023). Analisis Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire pada Mahasiswa Program Kartu Indonesia Pintar-Kuliah. Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi MIND SET, 14(02), 163-172.