MICROBIAL ELECTROLYSIS CELL CARBON ANODE WITH VOLTAGE VARIATION FOR HYDROGEN GAS PRODUCTION

Abid Fahreza Alphanoda; Afnaz Nurfalah Ramadhan

doi:10.35814/48adg368

Authors

Abid Fahreza Alphanoda Pancasila University
Afnaz Nurfalah Ramadhan Universitas Pancasila

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35814/48adg368

Keywords:

Microbial Electrolysis Cell (MEC), hydrogen, renewable energy, palm oil waste, anaerobic bacteria

Abstract

The global energy crisis and environmental impacts of fossil fuel usage have accelerated the development of sustainable renewable energy sources. Hydrogen (H₂) has emerged as a promising clean energy carrier due to its high calorific value and zero carbon emissions. This study aims to develop and optimize a Microbial Electrolysis Cell (MEC) system that utilizes palm oil waste as a substrate for hydrogen production. Using anaerobic bacteria, MECs convert organic compounds in the waste into electrons and protons, which are then electrochemically transformed into hydrogen gas with the aid of an external power source. The research involves a dual-chamber reactor setup (anode and cathode) using carbon electrodes and a proton exchange membrane, monitoring the volume of hydrogen gas generated. The results are expected to improve energy conversion efficiency, significantly reduce industrial waste, and contribute to the advancement of applicable clean energy technologies. MEC technology presents an innovative dual-solution approach by integrating waste treatment with renewable energy production efficiently.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] J. Lee, S. A. Lee, T. H. Lee, and H. W. Jang, “Unlocking the potential of chemical-assisted water electrolysis for green hydrogen production,” Ind. Chem. Mater., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 277–310, 2025, doi: 10.1039/d4im00163j.

[2] M. K. Sarmah, T. P. Singh, P. Kalita, and A. Dewan, “Sustainable hydrogen generation and storage - a review,” RSC Adv., vol. 13, no. 36, pp. 25253–25275, 2023, doi: 10.1039/d3ra04148d.

[3] C. M. Kalamaras and A. M. Efstathiou, “Hydrogen Production Technologies: Current State and Future Developments,” Conf. Pap. Energy, vol. 2013, pp. 1–9, 2013, doi: 10.1155/2013/690627.

[4] A. Z. Arsad et al., “Hydrogen electrolyser technologies and their modelling for sustainable energy production: A comprehensive review and suggestions,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 48, no. 72, pp. 27841–27871, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.04.014.

[5] T. J. Ao, C. G. Liu, Z. Y. Sun, X. Q. Zhao, Y. Q. Tang, and F. W. Bai, “Anaerobic digestion integrated with microbial electrolysis cell to enhance biogas production and upgrading in situ,” Biotechnol. Adv., vol. 73, no. January, p. 108372, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2024.108372.

[6] T. K. Wood, I. Gurgan, E. T. Howley, and I. H. Riedel-Kruse, “Converting methane into electricity and higher-value chemicals at scale via anaerobic microbial fuel cells,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 188, no. September, p. 113749, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2023.113749.

[7] A. E. Aydın and P. Yildirim, “Jo ur na l P re of,” J. Clean. Prod., p. 124250, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ptlrs.2025.04.002.

[8] Z. L. Yixin Zhang, Yu Zhang, “A Review of Hydrogen Production via Seawater Electrolysis :,” pp. 1–23, 2024.

[9] M. Yue, H. Lambert, E. Pahon, R. Roche, S. Jemei, and D. Hissel, “Hydrogen energy systems: A critical review of technologies, applications, trends and challenges,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 146, no. March, p. 111180, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111180.

[10] J. Sun, L. Etcheverry, and A. Bergel, “Revisiting basic assumptions of the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) for water electrolysis at near-neutral pH,” Chem. Eng. J., vol. 507, no. February, p. 160490, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2025.160490.

[11] K. J. Chae, M. J. Choi, J. Lee, F. F. Ajayi, and I. S. Kim, “Biohydrogen production via biocatalyzed electrolysis in acetate-fed bioelectrochemical cells and microbial community analysis,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 33, no. 19, pp. 5184–5192, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.05.013.

[12] A. Sharma, S. E. Hussain Mehdi, S. Pandit, S. Eun-Oh, and V. Natarajan, “Factors affecting hydrogen production in microbial electrolysis cell (MEC): A review,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 61, no. January, pp. 1473–1484, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.02.193.

[13] M. Kishimoto, R. Nakamura, and H. Iwai, “Effect of gas compositions on co-electrolysis performance of solid oxide cells: Electromotive force and polarization resistance,” Electrochim. Acta, vol. 513, no. December 2023, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2024.145439.

[14] A. Antonini, Y. Heider, G. Xotta, V. Salomoni, and F. Aldakheel, “Computational multi-physics modeling of membranes in proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 441, no. March, p. 117974, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2025.117974.

[15] F. C. Hartanto, N. N. Atikah, M. S. Indrawan, and A. H. Tambunan, “Potential for Utilizing POME to Produce Biohydrogen Gas Using Microbial Electrolysis Cell,” Int. J. Oil Palm, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 58–65, 2022, doi: 10.35876/ijop.v5i2.78.

[16] Yusnitati et al., “Biohydrogen production from palm oil mill effluent (POME) in Indonesia: Potential, challenges, and prospects,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 138, no. November, pp. 1315–1335, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.11.277.